Banks have spent decades building channels.
Branches expanded across cities and towns. Contact centres were introduced to support growing customer bases. Internet banking followed. Mobile banking arrived later and changed expectations again.
Each development improved access.
Go deeper with GlobalData
Access deeper industry intelligence
Experience unmatched clarity with a single platform that combines unique data, AI, and human expertise.
Yet an interesting problem remains.
Customers do not experience banking through channels. They experience banking through journeys.
A customer applying for a loan rarely thinks about whether they are interacting with a branch, a mobile application or a contact centre. They simply want to complete the process.
From their perspective, it is one relationship with one institution.
Inside the bank, however, the reality can be very different.
The journey may pass through multiple teams, systems and processes before it is completed. Information may move between departments. Decisions may be made in different places. Several channels may be involved.
One of the most important challenges in modern banking
The challenge is not access.
The challenge is continuity.
Consider a simple example.
A customer begins a loan application on a mobile phone during the evening. The next day they have a question and call the contact centre. Later they visit a branch to discuss the application and complete identity verification.
The customer sees a single interaction.
The institution may see three separate activities.
When these activities are not connected effectively, problems begin to appear.
Customers are asked to repeat information. Different channels provide different answers. Context is lost between interactions. Processes take longer than expected.
None of these issues are usually caused by bad intentions.
More often, they occur because organisations continue to operate through structures that were designed around channels rather than journeys.
This distinction matters.
Trust is often built during moments of consistency
Customers expect institutions to recognise who they are, understand what has already happened and know what should happen next.
When this occurs smoothly, confidence grows.
When it does not, confidence weakens.
The customer does not see organisational charts. They do not see technology platforms. They do not see departmental boundaries.
They experience one bank.
This principle has become increasingly important as financial services have evolved.
Predictions about the disappearance of physical banking have largely proven incorrect. Digital adoption continues to increase, but branches remain relevant for advice, complex products, vulnerable customers and significant life events.
Customers continue to move between physical and digital environments depending on their needs.
A balance enquiry may be completed through a mobile application. A mortgage discussion may require a conversation. A fraud concern may begin digitally and end with a personal interaction.
This behaviour is entirely rational.
Customers choose the channel that is most appropriate for the task
The challenge for institutions is ensuring continuity across those choices.
For many years, banks measured success through channel performance. How many calls were answered? How many branch transactions were completed? How many customers adopted digital services?
These measures remain useful.
However, they do not always reflect the quality of the overall customer experience.
A customer may interact successfully with several channels and still leave frustrated.
Why?
Because the journey itself was fragmented.
This is why customer journeys are becoming increasingly important in discussions about the future of banking.
The question is no longer whether digital channels are growing.
They are.
The question is how institutions connect the growing number of interactions that occur across those channels.
This is not only a customer experience issue.
It is also an operational and governance issue.
Behind every customer journey sits a network of systems, controls, processes and teams. Information moves across the organisation. Decisions must be recorded. Regulatory obligations must be met. Audit trails must be maintained.
As journeys become more complex, visibility becomes more important.
Institutions need to understand not only where work begins and ends, but how it moves across the entire process.
This creates opportunities for improvement.
Delays can be identified more quickly. Hand-offs can be simplified. Customer effort can be reduced. Operational accountability can become clearer.
Most importantly, institutions can begin to design around the customer journey rather than around individual channels.
That shift may prove significant during the coming decade.
The future of banking is unlikely to be defined by physical channels alone.
It is equally unlikely to be defined by digital channels alone.
Customers have already moved beyond that distinction.
They expect institutions to move with them.
The organisations that succeed will be those that create continuity across every interaction, regardless of where the journey starts or where it ends.
The future is therefore not physical versus digital.
The future is physical and digital working together.
Because customers do not think in channels.
They experience one bank.
Dr Gulzar Singh, Chartered Fellow – Banking and Technology Director, Phoenix Empire Ltd
